Comments for eyecurious

Comment on About eyecurious by Taka-Chan and I « LITTLE BROWN MUSHROOM BLOG

Taka-Chan and I « LITTLE BROWN MUSHROOM BLOG — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:41:59 +0000

[...] photography by Alec Soth on March 8, 2010 In a recent post on photo-novellas, Marc Feustel of eyecurious mentioned two children books by Eikoh Hosoe and Betty Lifton. I just received Taka-Chan and I, [...]

Comment on Word of the Year 2009 by Link Love: 3/5/2010 « The Bigger Picture

Link Love: 3/5/2010 « The Bigger Picture — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:16:37 +0000

[...] kindled back in 2009 at the NY Times, discussed at Museum Audience Insight, and more recently at eyecurious and edward_ [...]

Comment on March Madness: 1 month, 2 exhibitions by Alexander Dahl

Alexander Dahl — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:24:18 +0000

6 of march.. Just the day im leaving Stockholm. Would have been fun listening to you.. Well maybe next time.

Comment on Review: Japanese photobooks of the 1960s and ’70s by Review: Japanese photobooks of the 1960s and ’70s | eyecurious | The Click

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:42:29 +0000

[...] The book contains essays by Kaneko and Vartanian. Kaneko’s essay recounts his personal journey with the photobook, a unique one since few people were buying photobooks when he did (to the point where he once ordered a book only to have the publisher turn up at his door to deliver it himself because he thought it would be cheaper than sending it in the mail). [...]

Comment on iPhoneography by thePhontographer.com

thePhontographer.com — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:42:25 +0000

Sean, I am one of those enthusiasts. I’m a pro fashion photographer and have been struggling to keep up with all the latest and greatest gear when it comes to digital photography so I’ve decided to try against the odds and go with the “not-so-greatest”. I figured if I can create amazing images with one of the most limited cameras it will make me feel good – and it does. It’s such a fun challenge! There’s only one lens, no exposure control, and limited focus control. All these attributes do give the image a certain feel. Phontography, as I call it (since there are phone cameras out there other than just the iPhone) has it’s style due to the limitations.
thePhontographer.com

Comment on Some more fuel on the photo-book fire by The Future of Photobooks « APA San Francisco

The Future of Photobooks « APA San Francisco — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:34:49 +0000

[...] blogger. How should photobook CREATION evolve in next decade? Mediated by Marc Feustel, creator of eyecurious How should photobook CONSUMPTION evolve in next decade? Mediated by Todd Walker, creator of Gallery [...]

Comment on Moment of sublime strangeness: Medvedev on photography by Bill Anderson

Bill Anderson — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:37:32 +0000

Too bad he sees photography in such a simple light: one that promotes it as a method of recording world events for nostalgic posterity’s sake. A camera club type view of an art form that is equal to any other. An art form that, when practiced by genius’s like Andreas Gursky, can evoke emotions as profound as those stirred by the likes of Leanardo DaVinci. There is a oneness in art, despite its conflicting approaches, and that oneness transcends all mechanics. Try reading what A D Coleman has to say about this.

Comment on Moment of sublime strangeness: Medvedev on photography by Federico

Federico — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:27:44 +0000

Kind of creepy, innit? Yes, he does seem to have written at least part of it himself. I wonder whether the original speech is as abominable as its English subtitles…

Comment on Giacomo Brunelli by charles

charles — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:19:19 +0000

A reamly incredible picture, picture that i know for long biut who still impressionated me

Comment on Moment of sublime strangeness: Medvedev on photography by Dan

Dan — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:56:20 +0000

Compelling! Is it too naive to think that maybe he wrote some of it himself? He seems genuinely interested in photography…