-
Recent Posts
Categories
- African photography
- American photography
- Art Fairs / Festivals
- Asian photography
- Awards
- Book of the Week
- Book reviews
- Collecting
- Contemporary art
- European photography
- Events
- Exhibition reviews
- Existentialist photo-ramblings
- eyecurious News
- Interviews
- Japanese photography
- Latin American photography
- Magazines
- On a lighter note
- One to watch
- Photo-books
- Photo-journalism
- Projects
- Tangents
Archives
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- February 2009
Tumblr
-
RSS
Fresh On My Shelves
Photo-Art Blogs
- A Photo Student
- American Suburb X
- Andrew Phelps
- Asian Photography Blog
- B
- BLDGBLOG
- Consumptive
- DLK Collection
- Ed Winkleman
- Featureshoot
- Harvey Benge
- Heading East
- Horses Think
- Humble Arts Foundation
- insig.ht
- Japan Photo Info
- La Pura Vida
- Mrs Deane
- Photo Sensible
- Photographers Speak
- Photoguide Japan
- Shane Lavalette
- Street Level Japan
- The Year in Pictures
- Toxico Cultura
- Visual Culture Blog
- We Can’t Paint
- Wired Raw File
Photobook Blogs
Photographer Sites
Webzines





NY Photo Festival 2009 Round-up
Following on from my last post, here is one of the great things about photo-blogs: no sooner is the NY Photo Festival over than the reviews are already springing up all over the blogosphere. The picture I am getting so far is a bit disappointing. Don’t worry, I won’t be adding to the debate seeing as I don’t normally review things that I didn’t see, but here are a few of the comments I’ve come across so far.
One thing I do find strange is Daniel Power‘s responses to these comments (he is one of the organisers of the festival). He has been quick to respond to any criticism (including all of the posts linked to above) and I think it is normal that he should stand up and defend a project like NYPH, which is just getting off the ground in a pretty tough economic climate. That said, I find his responses a little too punchy, as if he is determined to refute every single piece of criticism, no matter how small. It seems to me like a missed opportunity for a young festival that is growing up in the age of the photo-blogosphere: this kind of free and informed feedback could help it find its feet.
Related posts: