<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Photoquai 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eyecurious.com/photoquai/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eyecurious.com/photoquai/</link>
	<description>A blog written by Marc Feustel about photography, with a focus on Japan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:24:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: L&#8217;eccesso di effetti speciali a Photoquai 2009 e due perle cinesi di rara bellezza</title>
		<link>http://www.eyecurious.com/photoquai/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#8217;eccesso di effetti speciali a Photoquai 2009 e due perle cinesi di rara bellezza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyecurious.com/?p=726#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>[...] manieristici. Anche quest&#8217;anno l&#8217;impressione generale è piuttosto negativa. Nella recensione di Photoquai 2009 pubblicata sul suo ottimo blog eyecurios, Marc Feustel arriva a conclusioni analoghe alle mie:   © [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] manieristici. Anche quest&#8217;anno l&#8217;impressione generale è piuttosto negativa. Nella recensione di Photoquai 2009 pubblicata sul suo ottimo blog eyecurios, Marc Feustel arriva a conclusioni analoghe alle mie:   © [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoquai, Paris: A Photo Festival for Non-Western Photographers &#171; Prison Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.eyecurious.com/photoquai/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoquai, Paris: A Photo Festival for Non-Western Photographers &#171; Prison Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyecurious.com/?p=726#comment-959</guid>
		<description>[...] Marc Feustel of eyecurious loved the ambition but was &#8220;pretty disappointed&#8221; by the quality throughout. He felt guilty for criticising a small, brave, new-festival-on-the-block but couldn&#8217;t forgive the &#8220;photographers who should be tried for Photoshop crimes against photography.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marc Feustel of eyecurious loved the ambition but was &#8220;pretty disappointed&#8221; by the quality throughout. He felt guilty for criticising a small, brave, new-festival-on-the-block but couldn&#8217;t forgive the &#8220;photographers who should be tried for Photoshop crimes against photography.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoshop Crimes against Photography: exactly what are the charges? &#171; Dominic Ambrose Virtual Art Gallery</title>
		<link>http://www.eyecurious.com/photoquai/comment-page-1/#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoshop Crimes against Photography: exactly what are the charges? &#171; Dominic Ambrose Virtual Art Gallery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyecurious.com/?p=726#comment-892</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124; Leave a Comment  Marc Feustel used the phrase “Photoshop crimes against photography” on his Eyecurious blog in connection with some of the work he saw displayed at Photoquai 2009. I saw the same exhibit, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | Leave a Comment  Marc Feustel used the phrase “Photoshop crimes against photography” on his Eyecurious blog in connection with some of the work he saw displayed at Photoquai 2009. I saw the same exhibit, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

