Plagiarism in photography

There is a bit of a fuss going on at Conscientious and PDN over photographs that look very similar. I am less interested in debating how similar two images are and whether we can consider there to be plagiarism (although if you have a few hundred hours to waste, I imagine that you could devote them all to trawling the internet comparing images by fine art photographers and finding striking similarities), but there are some very interesting questions surrounding this issue in the context of photographic ‘art’ and hopefully I will manage to turn my thoughts on the subject into a post soon. In the meantime, here is my latest random online discovery of two images that look pretty similar.

Hideaki Uchiyama, Japan Underground II

Hideaki Uchiyama, Japan Underground II, 2003

Andreas Gursky, Kamiokande, 2007

Andreas Gursky, Kamiokande, 2007

Share

Related posts:

  1. Moment of sublime strangeness: Medvedev on photography
  2. Is tilt-shift photography’s auto-tune?
  3. Is this really the future of photography?
This entry was posted in Existentialist photo-ramblings, Tangents and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

  1. Posted 22 November 2010 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    The photos really looks similar. I loved it! I can’t imagine that even in photography, plagiarism is still an issue. But I liked the way the photographer shoot the picture. It’s cool!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>